Of the critical areas on the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020:
• Teaching and Learning
• Educator Preparation and Development
• Leadership, Administration and Instructional Support
• Infrastructure for Technology
the most critical area of the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology is Educator Preparation and Development, in my opinion. In the article, Adopt and Adapt: Shaping Tech for the Classroom, Marck Prensky (2008) states that schools typically go through a four-step process when adopting technology.
1. Dabbling
2. Doing old things in old ways
3. Doing old things in new ways
4. Doing new things in new ways.
Without proper training, teachers who are digital immigrants (such as myself) will never advance to the last stage at a sufficient rate to engage and challenge their students. Technology develops and advances at such a fast pace that digital immigrants cannot keep up with the developments at a self-taught pace.
Besides learning how to use the technology, learning how to apply it and integrate it is even more complicated for digital immigrants. Thus, Educator Preparation and Development is the most critical area for accomplishing the Texas Long Range Plan for Technology. Learning from an expert or through a collaboration with fellow teachers allows an educator to see how to apply technology from a different perspective. It allows the educator to learn new ways of doing new things.
The Texas Education Agency releases the results of the School Technology and Readiness Chart (STaR Chart). During the 2007-2008 school year, 74.2% of all teachers surveyed stated that Educator Preparation and Development was in the Developing Tech level of progress. That is nearly 5% more than the teachers that stated Teaching and Learning was still in the Developing Tech level of progress (69.7%). Over the next three years, the percentage of teachers that felt like Educator Preparation and development was in the Developing Tech level of progress shrunk 5.5% to 68.7%. However, those that felt like Teaching and Learning was in the Developing Tech level of progress shrunk 10.4% to 59.3. The STaR Chart shows that teachers feel like Educator Preparation and Development is a weak area when it comes to integrating technology into the classroom.
Contrary to the statewide results, on my campus, the results showed that teachers felt like we were in an Advanced Tech level of progress during the 2007-2008 school year with a score of 15. The next year (2008-2009), we dropped to a Developing Tech level with a score of 14, but our scores during the next three years were 18, 18 and 16, respectively. Although we regressed some during the last year, our faculty and staff has felt like we are in an Advanced Level of Tech in the Educator Preparation and Training area.
References
Texas Education Agency, STaR Chart. Retrieved from
http://starchart.epsilen.com/
Presnky, M. (2008). Adopt and adapt: Shaping tech for the classroom.
Edutopia: The George Lucas Educational Foundation.